Comparing to Frankenstein
written by Mary Shelly, Rose (2002) points out some of the features of good and
evil that differ Buffy the Vampire slayer from the traditional Romantic notions.In
Frankenstein, Victor (the creator) is solely noble in his intention is to defy
nature forces and create life although his creation, Frankenstein (who failed
to seek acceptance), went on rampage because of Victor’s lack of guidance
(Rose, 2002). In Buffy, the situation is adapted in season 4, where Adam also
show his malevolent side in his attempt to ‘follow his mother’s goal (which is
wrong)’ to exterminate both human and demons. The difference is Adam, equipped
with high technology, killed his creator first hand and tries to know about
himself and the world on his own. This once again questioned the morality of
improving technology. Moreover, unlike Victor, Walsh (Adam’s creator), as seen
in the show isn’t all for noble intends. The mood set after she failed to kill
Buffy, brooding beside Adam not knowing he’s awoken would make one feel she is
almost evil.This means Buffy, in a sense, deconstruct Frankenstein as Adam and
Walsh unconsciously used technology in the evil way. The path is darker than
Frankenstein and Victor where the intentions are
originated from good but end up turned bad. In the end, Rose (2002) raises the
questionaddressing Shelly’s fear of the effect of technology and
industrialisation to humanity moral: “Just because technology makes something
possible, is it right to do it?”
Reference:
Rose, A (2002). Of creatures
andcreators: Buffy does Frankenstein, in R.Wilcox & D. Lavery (eds) Fighting
theforces: what’s at stake in Buffy thevampire slayer. Lanham: Rowman
andLittlefield.
Interesting analysis of the parallels & contrast between Buffy's representation of the Frankenstein story with the original one. It's just a contemporary use of how technology affects people's lives - whether it's good or bad but that depends on the desired results.
ReplyDeleteThis can also be seen in terms of medical progress such as organ transplants & other aspects of human-technology advancement.
Yes it is :P Take cloning which raised ethic problems a few years ago on whether it is ok or not to clone human as an example on technology advancement. I'm against it though. We definitely don't want another outbreak like nuclear weapons.
ReplyDeleteA good response - though you might have looked to the Braum text to develop this discussion further.
ReplyDelete